Eighth Circuit: Saul Aguilar-Sanchez v. Merrick Garland

 Where the proposed generic federal definition of the crime includes a mens rea element of desire or gratification, a state statute requiring the intent to hire someone for those purposes has sufficiently similar scienter.  State decision that an incidental harassing solicitation of passerby demonstrated sufficient intent for a parallel statute did not make the state statute's reach broader than that of the federal crime.

Saul Aguilar-Sanchez  v.  Merrick Garland