Shifting the bankruptcy proceeding to another statutory title for purposes of liquidation finalized the rights of the parties with significant and irreparable consequences, so the order is sufficiently final for purposes of appeal.
Court did not abuse its discretion in moving to liquidation, despite the possibility that the order would diminish the party's ability to recover funds in pending lawsuits, given concerns about the management of the estate.
Party insufficiently prejudiced by two-day violation of notice requirement. Lack of counsel at hearing not prejudicial, as there was no objection to withdrawal or request for continuance.