Force majeure clause could be invoked to cancel the contract; there was no obligation to reschedule or change the manner of performance.
The catch-all term of the force majeure clause justified the cancellation, even under strict construction; eusdem generis reading of the enumerated grounds implies that any societal disruption not due to fault or negligence and beyond the parties' control qualified.
Discretionary postponement of performance according to state advisory guidance was a de minimis breach, if at all, since by the time of scheduled performance, the state had issued compulsory guidance.
Absent explicit language of condition, courts can't look beyond integrated agreements to infer that one is conditional upon performance of the other.
Violation of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing doesn't state a claim where it is based on the same theory and facts as the breach claim.