Proof that an IP associated with the house was used to access relevant email and crypto-coin sites, combined with affidavit statement that financial and personal records are often kept at the home, was sufficient probable cause for a search of the house in an online fraud investigation. The fact that the fraudulent transactions were committed before moving there isn't dispositive of whether there was likely to be evidence at the house.
A 15-20 month gap between the thefts and the affidavit didn't make the affidavit claims stale, given the nature of computer memory.
Discrepancy in URL TLD on the warrant affidavit was inconsequential.
Personally issued website development test accounts sufficiently identify their authorized users to be the basis for a charge of aggravated identity theft.
Deft's immigration status wasn't critical to establishing a defense for the use of crypto-coin; court did not abuse its discretion in excluding it.
Juror's work with the same large corporate division was insufficient for a claim of implied bias, since the fact patterns at issue in the trial weren't similar to the events of their employment.