Absent a showing of delioberate indifference or subjective awareness of risk to the detained arrestee, there is no issue for trial on the S1983 claim.
Absent a policy of mental health screening, using personal assessment to answer the mental health questions on the intake form was a discretionary act, rather than ministerial in nature, as was the staff's personal meeting with the arrestee. County's decision to have a formal mental health assessment 72 hours later was policymaking, not operational, and therefore incurred statutory public entity immunity.
Court did not abuse its discretion in denying aleave to amend to a party who did not notice the depositions witnesses who could provide the information that ws the basis of the motion to amend prior to the last date to amend the claim.
http://media.ca8.uscourts.gov/opndir/21/08/201821P.pdf