Testimony of co-conspirator is sufficient evidence for conviction, unless the testimony is incredible or insubstantial on its face; it is for the finder of fact to weigh the credibility of the testimony. De novo review, as both counsel recited the form of the motion for acquittal.
Proof of a phone call between the two at that time is sufficient evidence for having made a false material statement denying knowledge of a person's whereabouts.
Stipulation to felony status at trial is sufficient to establish contemporary knowledge of that status at the time of firearm possession.
Despite the fact that a large number of juror questions was allowed, deft has not identified, and the court has not found, any that indicate prejudice.
CONCURRENCE IN THE JUDGMENT:
The appeal of the felon in possession count shouldn't have been de novo, even arguendo.