Although the immigration removal order signed at the end of the earlier proceedings was signed by the prosecuting authority at the direction of the IJ, there is sufficient evidence of a proper removal order, since both that version and a version later signed by the judge are in the administrative record.
Proper inspection and a procedurally regular admission at the border did not establish a lawful entry, since the statute prohibited entry for ten years after the earlier removal.
Board's correctly determined that, given the phrasing of the current statute, there is no miscarriage of justice exception to the prohibition on reopening a reinstated removal order.