District Court's denial of leave to execute the judgment was sufficiently final for appeal, as it finished the matter in the court below.
Doubt as to whether notice of appeal listing only the motion to reconsider but asking that the underlying order be vacated conferred sufficient jurisdiction to vacate the underlying order, even absent prejudice.
No abuse of discretion in District Court's equitable decision to deny the motion.
As there was no fundamental misapprehension of facts or law, similarly no abuse of discretion in the denial of the motion to reconsider.