Sufficient evidence, given facts.
Where deft lives in a certain judicial district and has a bank in that district, jury might have legitimately found that venue was proper in conspiracy in prosecution; vicinage concerns are not implicated where deft lives in the district.
Jury sending note to judge during proceedings asking for clarification of charges is insufficient to establish improper deliberations where individually interviewed jurors claim that discussion of the merits had not occurred.
Govt experts general statements based on small fraction of files reviewed were harmless error.
Although instruction on deliberate ignorance was an abuse of discretion given lack of purposeful contrivance, inclusion was harmless error.
No clear error where sentencing report estimates drug quantities without a showing on the percentage of lawful prescriptions.
No plain error where conflicting findings would result from using the totality of either of the two versions of the Guidelines, rather than the combination of the two elected by the sentencing court.
Firearm in adjoining office sufficient for sentencing bump where prescriptions were written in an examination room.