End of Day. Oddly exhausted.

Also:

http://media.ca8.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/TodayOpn.pl

https://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/?pk_id=0000009531

=https://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/?pk_id=0000009531

https://www.ca10.uscourts.gov/clerk/opinions/daily

-CB

Eighth Circuit: BNSF Railway Company v. Seats, Incorporated

State common-law tort action against railway suppliers is not preemepted.

http://media.ca8.uscourts.gov/opndir/18/08/171399P.pdf

Eighth Circuit: Mark Tettey Kom Degbe v. Jefferson B. Sessions, III

Challenge to denial of untimely asylum appeal construed as challenge to decision not to remand.  Insufficient grounds.  Deference to Executive on country conditions.

http://media.ca8.uscourts.gov/opndir/18/08/171338P.pdf


Eighth Circuit: Brian King v. The City of Crestwood, MO

Where plaintiff lacks standing to seek federal review of state court decision on the merits, dismissal under Rooker-Feldman is not mandatory; the case can be dismissed for standing.

Municipal court is not a policymaking authority; the outcome of an adjudication therefore can't give rise to a municipal liability claim under S1983.

http://media.ca8.uscourts.gov/opndir/18/08/164560P.pdf

Eighth Circuit: Charlene Eggers v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Statistical evidence of disparate impact is required to state a claim that an employer's policy had a disparate impact on older workers so long as the policy is not a sweeping disqualification.

http://media.ca8.uscourts.gov/opndir/18/08/164376P.pdf

Seventh Circuit: David Bishop v. Air Line Pilots Association, I

Allegations that a union privileged a more powerful faction within the union, together with a showing of deceptive actions can state a claim  for breach of the duty of fair representation.

http://media.ca7.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/rssExec.pl?Submit=Display&Path=Y2018/D08-13/C:17-1438:J:Ripple:aut:T:fnOp:N:2201507:S:0

Seventh Circuit: Straits Financial LLC v. Ten Sleep Cattle Co.

Account guarantee agreement for cattle hedging account void  where plaintiff had no knowledge of the illicit trades being made using it.

Duty to mitigate begins with actual knowledge.

http://media.ca7.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/rssExec.pl?Submit=Display&Path=Y2018/D08-13/C:17-2100:J:Hamilton:aut:T:fnOp:N:2201302:S:0

Seventh Circuit: Katrina Walker v. Carl Weatherspoon

Uncorroborated tip sufficient for warrant.

Non-jurisdictional cutoff date for appeals waived, since the rules aren't jurisdictional, and  the gov't described the brief as "early"

http://media.ca7.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/rssExec.pl?Submit=Display&Path=Y2018/D08-13/C:17-2665:J:Easterbrook:aut:T:fnOp:N:2201016:S:0

Seventh Circuit: Iowna Portalatin v. Blatt, Hasenmiller, Leibsker

Comprehensive settlement agreement reached during trial released claim for statutory damages and fees.

Penalties under the statute are not per deft.


http://media.ca7.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/rssExec.pl?Submit=Display&Path=Y2018/D08-13/C:17-3335:J:Manion:aut:T:fnOp:N:2201522:S:0


Sixth Circuit: Kurt Harrington v. J. Ray Ormond

Habeas challenge arising from Supreme Court holding narrowing the causation element of the offense can proceed to argument on the question of retroactivity absent explicit retroactivity assertion by the Supreme Court where other circuits have recognized the ruling as retroactive.

http://www.opn.ca6.uscourts.gov/opinions.pdf/18a0165p-06.pdf


Third Circuit: US v. Ronald Peppers

ACCA residual clause minimum Habeas showing is a mere possibility that the sentencing court acted under that section of the law.

Plea deal did not waive Habeas challenge to sentence, so long as the Habeas minimum showing is met, as parties can't stipulate to a sentence in excess of legal limits.

So long as there is a valid petition arising from a Supreme Court holding made retroactive to cases on collateral review, non-retroactive cases decided in the interval can cited to describe the current state of the law.

Under categorical review, state robbery statute isn't a valid predicate; petitioner did not brief whether state burglary statute is covered under the elements clause of the law; challenge to that predicate conviction is therefore waived.

Second Circuit: Jaen v. Sessions

For the purposes of the Immigration Act, a child lawfully born into a lawful marriage is (conclusively) presumed to be the child of both parents.  Parallel holding under state law as alternative ground.

http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c47e857f-f701-4ef9-a7f8-4e6809e4f3e8/1/doc/17-1512_opn.pdf#xml=http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c47e857f-f701-4ef9-a7f8-4e6809e4f3e8/1/hilite/