Third Circuit: In re. Energy Future Holdings

Bankruptcy court's order was an interlocutory one, as the court retained jurisdiction over the order and the case itself -- no clear error in court's decision that it had clearly erred earlier and the court's granting of a motion to amend filed under the inherent authority of the court.

Dissent: Nullifying an order without a clear error of fact or law undercuts commercial reliance.

http://www2.ca3.uscourts.gov/opinarch/181109p.pdf