Voter filing assistance statute minimally burdens 1st & 14th Amendments; plaintiff did not demonstrate burden o discrete subgroups; no showing of prior fraud was needed, as the state might be preserving trust in the process; holding that disproportionate impact was de minimis was not clear error; legislature acted without intent to discriminate.
Discarding out-of-precinct ballots similarly upheld.
Dissent: Disparate impact, history of discrimaination, Section 2 of VRA problematic, etc.
http://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2018/09/12/18-15845.pdf
Since 2011. An occasional commonplacing of the U.S. Circuit Courts of Appeal.
Neither an authoritative statement of the law nor legal advice. Quick work.