Ninth Circuit Bohmker v. State of Oregon

As state law banning motorized mining in certain areas has a clear purpose, is closely tailored, does not choose land use, and is not integrated within land use scheme, it is not field (pun?)  or conflict preempted by federal mining and and use law.

Dissent: It restricts use of land.

http://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2018/09/12/16-35262.pdf