Immigration judge's finding that the persecution was economic in nature was not clearly erroneous in forgoing analysis of secondary and mixed motives, as the record indicates that mixed motives were considered, and nothing in the record suggests that either the judge or the agency understood the finding of economic motive to preclude a finding of secondary or mixed motives.
A social group of single mothers who cannot move from their region is insufficiently particular for consideration of the possibility of future persecution.
Bare claim that agency's data is dated is insufficient to make it arbitrary or capricious absent a showing of changed conditions.
http://media.ca1.uscourts.gov/pdf.opinions/17-2095P-01A.pdf
Since 2011. An occasional commonplacing of the U.S. Circuit Courts of Appeal.
Neither an authoritative statement of the law nor legal advice. Quick work.