The pace, it must increase. Look for increased coverage in coming days, if you're reading this. Which you shouldn't be, as it shouldn't be relied upon for anything.
Other precedential holdings on 8/28
http://www2.ca3.uscourts.gov/opinarch/171990p.pdf
http://www2.ca3.uscourts.gov/opinarch/163346p.pdf
http://www.opn.ca6.uscourts.gov/opinions.pdf/18a0190p-06.pdf
http://www.opn.ca6.uscourts.gov/opinions.pdf/18a0191p-06.pdf
http://media.ca7.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/rssExec.pl?Submit=Display&Path=Y2018/D08-28/C:17-2132:J:Easterbrook:aut:T:fnOp:N:2208964:S:0
http://media.ca7.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/rssExec.pl?Submit=Display&Path=Y2018/D08-28/C:17-2920:J:Barrett:aut:T:fnOp:N:2209369:S:0
http://media.ca8.uscourts.gov/opndir/18/08/164275P.pdf
http://media.ca8.uscourts.gov/opndir/18/08/164440P.pdf
http://media.ca8.uscourts.gov/opndir/18/08/171300P.pdf
http://media.ca8.uscourts.gov/opndir/18/08/172296P.pdf
http://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2018/08/28/16-55249.pdf
http://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2018/08/28/16-50096.pdf
http://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2018/08/28/15-17517.pdf
http://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2018/08/28/15-17517.pdf
http://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2018/08/28/15-17497.pdf
http://media.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub/files/201711742.pdf
-CB