Third Circuit: USA ex rel. Donald Palmer v. C&D Technologies Inc

District court did not err in reducing fee award below the level requested by another party; as it was opposed, the court did not act sua sponte, and courts frequently award fees according to prevailing rates as established by extrinsic evidence.

No abuse in limiting fees for deposition, given the interest in reducing the crowds of lawyers there.

Remanded for the District court to consider whether the Relator is owed fees for the present action for fees.

http://www2.ca3.uscourts.gov/opinarch/172350p.pdf