Provision and use of a dictionary in deliberations over contemporaneous objection and by a second judge was not an abuse of discretion, as the court polled the jurors afterwards as to whether it was used dispositively, and the relevant intent-level definition was not facially unhelpful to the deft.
http://media.ca1.uscourts.gov/pdf.opinions/16-1396P-01A.pdf
Since 2011. An occasional commonplacing of the U.S. Circuit Courts of Appeal.
Neither an authoritative statement of the law nor legal advice. Quick work.