Eighth Circuit: United States v. Tong Moua

As the trial court is best positioned to judge the facts, sufficient evidence for robbery conviction where a single witness who had earlier identified another person made an in-court identification, deft was seen in a vehicle that was later found near a robbery with incriminating writing-pad impressions, warrantless cell-phone location data placed the deft near the robberies, and items of clothing similar to those seen during the robbery were found at the apartment.  Sentence substantively not unreasonable.

http://media.ca8.uscourts.gov/opndir/18/07/172046P.pdf