Third Circuit: Aguedita Ordonez Tevalan v. Attorney General United States

Immigration

Where a petitioner has filed an appeal with the court, the court is not divested of jurisdiction by the agency's granting of a motion to repoen the matter, particularly where the reopening of the case is for ministerial reissuing of orders and decisions.

Where there is objective evidence of inconsistent statements in the record, there is sufficient evidence for an agency's adverse credibility decision.

Insufficient grounds for protection under CAT.

Aguedita Ordonez Tevalan v. Attorney General United States